Rat-Think

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Rats have a complex form of thought once known only in humans and other primates—specifically, metacognition, or the ability to mull over what one knows. Scientists at the University of Georgia gave rats a choice to either take a test or not. Passing the test resulted in a large food reward, failure yielded nothing, and opting out altogether led to a small reward. The test played noises of various durations that the rats had previously learned to classify as short (lasting two to 3.6 seconds) or long (4.4 to eight seconds). The more difficult it was to gauge the sound length—for instance, if the noise lasted 4.4 seconds—the more often rodents bailed out from the test. The findings, in the March 20 Current Biology, suggest the rats could judge whether they would pass or fail, hinting that metacognition may be more widespread than thought before.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 296 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Rat-Think” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 296 No. 5 (), p. 36
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0507-36b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe