New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Real Stinkers Reformed

Malodorous but useful chemicals now smell sweet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Name the world's most offensive odor: Rotting fish? Refinery fumes? Skunk spray? For many organic chemists, top honors go to a family of carbon-nitrogen-based compounds called isonitriles. This chemical group is "the Godzilla of smells ... they make you vomit your guts out instantly," declared Luca Turin, a leading olfaction theorist and protagonist of Chandler Burr's 2003 biography, The Emperor of Scent. Add the fact that a prime ingredient for isonitriles is phosgene gas--a notorious chemical warfare agent from World War I, and it is little surprise that many investigators shun these noxious and unstable substances despite their acknowledged utility in drug discovery, polymer manufacture and elsewhere.

That situation is apt to change soon, however. Two researchers at the University of California, Riverside, have recently synthesized fragrant isonitriles that not only work just as well as their foul-smelling cousins but are safer to formulate. The aromas of the new substances include soy, malt, old wood, cherry and even taffy, report chemist Michael C. Pirrung and his postdoctoral student Subir Ghorai in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. "These compounds are so versatile and easy to make that I think that many people will use them for many purposes," Pirrung predicts.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe