New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Really Cold Fusion

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fusion ordinarily requires multimillion-degree heat, but a bucket-sized device fuses nuclei below freezing. The core of the machine is a lithium tantalate crystal, which generates an electric field when heated. A tungsten needle connected to the liquid-nitrogen-cooled pyroelectric substance focuses this field, such that when the crystal is warmed to roughly —3 degrees Celsius, deuterium ions surrounding the needle get kicked at speeds high enough to fuse with a deuterium- loaded target. Pyroelectric fusion power generators are unrealistic—a single run of the machine produces roughly 10 nanojoules, barely enough to heat a thimbleful of water a few millionths of a degree. Still, the process could lead to palm-sized neutron generators far simpler than conventional devices for use as thrusters in miniature spacecraft or in advanced medical therapies. Physicists at the University of California at Los Angeles report their findings in the April 28 Nature.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Really Cold Fusion” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 1 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0705-26b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe