Really Cold Fusion

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fusion ordinarily requires multimillion-degree heat, but a bucket-sized device fuses nuclei below freezing. The core of the machine is a lithium tantalate crystal, which generates an electric field when heated. A tungsten needle connected to the liquid-nitrogen-cooled pyroelectric substance focuses this field, such that when the crystal is warmed to roughly —3 degrees Celsius, deuterium ions surrounding the needle get kicked at speeds high enough to fuse with a deuterium- loaded target. Pyroelectric fusion power generators are unrealistic—a single run of the machine produces roughly 10 nanojoules, barely enough to heat a thimbleful of water a few millionths of a degree. Still, the process could lead to palm-sized neutron generators far simpler than conventional devices for use as thrusters in miniature spacecraft or in advanced medical therapies. Physicists at the University of California at Los Angeles report their findings in the April 28 Nature.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Really Cold Fusion” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 1 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0705-26b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe