Reasonable Doubt

Data secrecy clouds judgments of lethal injection

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On May 13, 2005, Connecticut prison officials performed the first execution in the state since 1960. Following a protocol dictated in Oklahoma in 1977, they gave serial killer Michael Ross an overdose of an ultrashort-acting barbiturate, a chemical paralytic and a heart-stopping salt via an intravenous line. In 20 minutes, he was pronounced dead. But state officials were not finished with him: 20 minutes later the medical examiner drew a sample of blood from his femoral artery; hours later a second extraction was done during autopsy.

“We have to investigate it” as a homicide, explains H. Wayne Carver II, Connecticut’s chief medical examiner. “Part of what you want out of an autopsy in these [homicide] cases is to determine not only what happened but also what didn’t happen.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe