Recipe for D-I-Y DNA Decoding Revealed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A thousand dollars can buy a lot of things. Scientists hope to soon add an individual's genetic sequence to that list. Full-genome DNA decoding, estimated to now cost $20 million, could soon be done for about $2.2 million, experts say, and will continue to drop in price as researchers develop new ways to conquer the task. A report published online yesterday by the journal Science suggests one such method: a technique that used off-the-shelf instruments and reagents to successfully sequence the E. coli genome.

A commonly available epifluorescence microscope and a digital camera lie at the heart of the novel approach described by Jay Shendure of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues. Employing tiny beads just one micron wide, the researchers replicated thousands of DNA sections simultaneously. The team next used four different fluorescent dyes, which each bind selectively to one DNA base, to "read" the DNA sequence by color, passing over 14 million beads laid out in an area the size of a dime. The microscope and camera covered the same sequence multiple times and a computer program interpreted the pattern and converted it to the more familiar linear base-pair sequence. Tests on the E. coli genome indicate that this technique has an error rate of less than one mistake per million bases and that it was able to pick up small mutations between the strain used in the experiment and one deciphered using the conventional approach.

The researchers calculate that the price tag associated with their sequencing strategy is one ninth that of current sequencing setups. Improvements are still required before it can become commonplace, however. For one, its raw accuracy is still at least an order of magnitude lower than the widely used Sanger technique. But if such enhancements can be made, genome sequencing could one day be available in even the smallest laboratories, which currently can't afford it, and possibly lead to better health care. "The cost of $1,000 for a human genome should allow prioritization of detailed diagnostics and therapeutics," Church says, "as is already happening with cancer."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe