New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Recipe for D-I-Y DNA Decoding Revealed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A thousand dollars can buy a lot of things. Scientists hope to soon add an individual's genetic sequence to that list. Full-genome DNA decoding, estimated to now cost $20 million, could soon be done for about $2.2 million, experts say, and will continue to drop in price as researchers develop new ways to conquer the task. A report published online yesterday by the journal Science suggests one such method: a technique that used off-the-shelf instruments and reagents to successfully sequence the E. coli genome.

A commonly available epifluorescence microscope and a digital camera lie at the heart of the novel approach described by Jay Shendure of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues. Employing tiny beads just one micron wide, the researchers replicated thousands of DNA sections simultaneously. The team next used four different fluorescent dyes, which each bind selectively to one DNA base, to "read" the DNA sequence by color, passing over 14 million beads laid out in an area the size of a dime. The microscope and camera covered the same sequence multiple times and a computer program interpreted the pattern and converted it to the more familiar linear base-pair sequence. Tests on the E. coli genome indicate that this technique has an error rate of less than one mistake per million bases and that it was able to pick up small mutations between the strain used in the experiment and one deciphered using the conventional approach.

The researchers calculate that the price tag associated with their sequencing strategy is one ninth that of current sequencing setups. Improvements are still required before it can become commonplace, however. For one, its raw accuracy is still at least an order of magnitude lower than the widely used Sanger technique. But if such enhancements can be made, genome sequencing could one day be available in even the smallest laboratories, which currently can't afford it, and possibly lead to better health care. "The cost of $1,000 for a human genome should allow prioritization of detailed diagnostics and therapeutics," Church says, "as is already happening with cancer."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe