Recognition Engines

New computer designs process networked "streams" of data for better spam and virus detection

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The computer industry survived for much longer than it should have on the assurance that faster processors every few years would cover a multitude of sins--the inefficiency and bloated size of application software being some of the worst transgressions. That luxury appears to be fading as power consumption has skyrocketed and the circuit boards on which the microprocessors sit threaten to transmute themselves into space heaters. Intel (where the hallowed Moore's law has reigned) and other hardware makers have responded by designing computers to run multiple processors at slower speeds.

Multiprocessors come with their own baggage, however. First, writing software that apportions computational tasks among several processors remains an unwanted burden for many programmers. Moreover, a number of the fastest-growing networking applications--from virus scanning to reading Web documents encoded in extensible markup language (XML)--do not lend themselves readily to parallel processing....

Gary Stix is the former senior editor of mind and brain topics at Scientific American.

More by Gary Stix
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Recognition Engines” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012006-7gmGHCCtfkfgiTHYnC0Usm

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe