Reconnecting Kids with the Outdoors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers who study obesity can calculate calories, measure weight and, over time, convincingly link the two. That straightforward equation supports a sim­ple argument for altering the built environ­ment to get children moving. But could a less clinical connection with nature be equally important? Across the nation, researchers, environmentalists and political leaders are sounding the alarm over a nonmedical condition dubbed “nature-deficit disorder.”

In a popular 2006 book, Last Child in the Woods, journalist Richard Louv coined the term, which he defined as a critical disconnect between children and nature. The book lamented this fundamental loss—and its social, psychological and even political implications. As kids spend fewer hours exploring, playing or just poking around outdoors, Louv argued, they lose creativity, a sense of belonging and an appreciation for the world around them.

Nature’s broad health value has not been rigorously studied, partly because it is difficult to evaluate clinically, notes Richard Jackson, an adjunct professor of environmental health at the University of California, Berkeley, and former director of the National Center for Environmental Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But, he argues, that snag shouldn’t slow efforts to address the situation. “The tragedy is that we removed nature from children’s lives without the benefit of a randomized, controlled clinical trial, so why would we need trials to restore childhood?” Jackson says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Indeed, governmental organizations are already spring­ing into action. Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell, for instance, recently launched “No Child Left Inside,” an initiative to inspire families in his state to explore the outdoors. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department has rolled out “Life’s Better Outside,” a similar public awareness campaign. —K.B.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe