Red Squirrels Plan Ahead for Babies

A new study shows that the animals coordinate their litters based on their anticipation of nut yields.

by Ciara Curtin

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Nut-obsessed squirrels scurry around collecting and secreting away food for the future. The amount of acorns they find, though, is not what determines how many baby squirrels there will be in the spring. Instead, squirrels predict how abundant their food supply will be the following year and coordinate a second litter to be born during times of bountiful harvests, says a new study.

Some trees, including those with seeds favored by red squirrels, have years of very high seed yields, followed by years of lower seed production, creating what Stan Boutin, a biologist at the University of Alberta, calls a "swamp and starve" strategy. Usually, the size of a predator population depends on how much food is available. When resources are plentiful, they reproduce more. The problem is that the food supply may dwindle by the time their young are born.

To determine if increased food triggers the second litter, Boutin and his colleagues offered part of the North American red squirrel study population extra food, but there was no change in the number or size of litters compared with the population that did not receive more food. "It wasn't just resource tracking," Boutin notes. "Something else was going on."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By monitoring red squirrels and seeds in Canada's Yukon Territory, Belgium and Italy, the researchers report in this week's Science that they determined the animals can somehow predict which years will be boom years for seeds. They are not sure what cues the squirrels to have more young but they speculate that the squirrels may be eating buds off the trees the preceding fall and that the extra plant hormones from them may trigger the extra litter born the next summer.

"It's a fascinating twist on the life histories of mammals," says Tim Karels, a terrestrial biologist at California State University, Northridge, who was not involved in the study.

The researchers also noted that North American squirrels did something their European cousins did not. The New World females became pregnant before they were done nursing the first litter. In most mammals, ovulation is suppressed during lactation. Boutin suspects this block is circumvented by a break in lactation, but acknowledges that eggs fertilized during the late winter could be stored within the females' bodies and to be implanted later in their uteruses to develop.

If the cue that initiates increased reproduction is isolated, Karels says, then it could eventually be used in agriculture to prod other mammals into having more offspring.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe