New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Reefer Sanity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Faced with declines in coral reefs from pollution, overuse and climate change, reef managers have begun implementing “marine protected areas”—no-fishing zones. One of the first studies of the ecological effect of such zones shows how they might help. A group led by researchers at the University of Exeter in England studied a sea park in the Bahamas that has not been fished since 1986. An open question was whether the resurgence of predatory grouper fish would kill off helpful parrotfish, which foster reef growth by grazing seaweed. The team found that net grazing actually doubled, coinciding with a fourfold reduction in seaweed proliferation in the protected area compared with fishable areas. The reason: larger parrotfish became more plentiful after fishing ceased. The grouper have trouble feeding on the bigger fish, which in turn graze seaweed more extensively than smaller ones. Dive into the January 6 Science for more.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Reefer Sanity” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 3 (), p. 32
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0306-32c

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe