New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Regular Mini Doses of Caffeine More Energizing Than Morning Mug

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A lot of people start their day with a big cup of coffee, hoping that the caffeine will invigorate them. But findings published today in the May issue of the journal SLEEP indicate that there might be a better way to stay awake for long periods. According to the report, low doses of caffeine administered at regular intervals may provide improved pick-me-up benefits.

James Wyatt of the Rush University Medical Center and his colleagues studied 16 men for 29 days while they stayed in private windowless suites free of time cues from the outside world. The researchers scheduled 42.85-hour days for the subjects, simulating the amount of time many doctors, truckers and emergency services personnel must stay awake. By disrupting the men's circadian rhythms, which promote sleepiness in a cyclical fashion, the scientists instead focused on the homeostatic push for sleep, which becomes stronger the longer someone is awake. Previous analyses of caffeine's ability to energize have shown that when people consume a large amount of caffeine in one sitting, the levels of the compound in their bloodstream will peak and then fall as the day goes on. "Unfortunately, the physiological process they need to counteract is not a major player until the latter half of the day," Wyatt explains.

In the new study, the scientists instead tested the effects of administering an hourly, low dose of caffeine equivalent to about two ounces of coffee to one group, while the second group received a placebo. The caffeinated men performed better on cognitive tests than the control individuals did, and dozed off less often. And though they received the same cumulative dose as subjects in previous, single-dose studies, taking many small doses minimized some of the negative side effects that caffeine can have, such as tremors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings strengthen the hypothesis that caffeine blocks a receptor for adenosine, a messenger involved in the homeostatic sleep cycle, but they also indicate that caffeine can¿t replace the restorative effects of shuteye: although the caffeine-takers stayed awake more than the control group, they reported feeling sleepier. "While there is no perfect substitute for sleep, our results point the way toward a much better method for using caffeine in order to maintain optimal vigilance and attention," Wyatt says, "particularly when someone has to remain awake longer than the traditional 16-hour wake episode."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe