Remarkable Target Practice by the Flagship of the Pacific Fleet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If the results recently obtained in target practice by Admiral Evans's flagship, the “Connecticut,” may be taken as- representing the average skill of the gunners on the sixteen battleships of the Pacific fleet, the fighting value of the fleet is established beyond all question. Two targets, each measuring 30 feet high by 50 feet long, were used, the fire during the earlier part of the run being directed at the first target, and the later shots being aimed at the second target. The “Connecticut,” steaming at 10 knots an hour, opened fire at four and a half miles. She continued firing for eight minutes; and, at the command to cease fire, she was five and a half miles from the second target. In that time she had put through the target four 12-inch, nine 8-inch, and seventeen 7-inch shells. Considering the great range and that the target was only one- eighth as long as a modern battleship, this was phenomenally good shooting.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 97 Issue 23This article was published with the title “Remarkable Target Practice by the Flagship of the Pacific Fleet” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 97 No. 23 (), p. 406
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12071907-406b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe