Remember Me?: New Martian Images from a Rover Not Named Curiosity

Knock, knock—it's Opportunity. That's right, Curiosity isn't the only rover in town.

NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornell Univ./USGS/Modesto Junior College

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Knock, knock—it's Opportunity. That's right, Curiosity isn't the only rover in town. Back in 2004 the twin rovers Spirit and Opportunity landed on the Red Planet for 90-day missions that have been extended by several years. After a scientifically fruitful stint, Spirit became mired in sand and ceased communicating with Earth in 2010, but Opportunity is still slowly exploring the Martian surface. Long before car-sized Curiosity stole the show, NASA had been using the much smaller rovers to gather data about whether Mars could support life.

Not to be outdone by the newcomer, Opportunity is looking at the Kirkwood outcropping on the western rim of Endeavour Crater, on the opposite side of the planet from Curiosity. (There are no plans for the two rovers to rendezvous.) Opportunity snapped this image of tiny, rounded "spherules" on September 6 using the microscopic imager on its arm, one of its many built-in scientific instruments. This view is only 60 millimeters across, and is made up of four images stitched together. The largest of these intriguing spherules in the picture are about 3.175 millimeters in diameter.

Opportunity is no stranger to teensy, globular Martian formations. Back in 2004, it found hematite-rich spheres dubbed "blueberries" near its landing site. Those formations may have been caused by long-ago liquid water. Opportunity has been studying the newly discovered spherules with one of its tools, the Alpha Particle X-Ray Spectrometer. The mysterious, new bumps are different in composition from the blueberries, and scientists don't yet have a prevailing theory on their origin.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Evelyn Lamb

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe