New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Will You or the Grid Control Your Electric Car?

Simply controlling where and when electric cars charge could go a long way to easing any spikes in electricity demand

There's a place in Austin, Texas, where the residents have agreed to be the test subjects for a renewable energy and smart grid future—and it's named after a nut. The Pecan Street demonstration project—part of the newly built 280-hectare neighborhood known as Mueller—has become the largest concentrated community of electric vehicle (EV) owners in the world. The community now has nearly 60 Chevy Volt owners alone, thanks to the demonstration project's commitment to match the federal government's $7,500 rebate incentive, effectively halving the price of the hybrid electric cars. And, in addition to learning where and when EV owners charge up their cars, Volt manufacturer General Motors is hoping to learn from the folks in the Pecan Street project how a residential fleet of electric vehicles might change the electric grid.

Such a dense cluster of electric vehicles might strain the grid if all owners try to charge them at the same time—say, on returning home in the evening—and that does indeed seem to be the case based on preliminary monitoring. So GM is considering a new program that delivers so-called "demand response" that can ease back the amount of electricity each car's battery pack consumes. For example, on a hot summer evening when electricity is in high demand for air-conditioning, the system could drop the amount of power going to an individual car from 3.3 kilowatts to just 1.2 kW or even less, explains Paul Pebbles, GM's global manager of Electric Vehicle and Smart Grid Services.

The technology works through the now ubiquitous OnStar technology for GM cars and is applicable to all the EVs GM makes, from the Volt sedan to the new Spark EV minicar. (OnStar can also be used to help the new Spark EV find charging stations while en route—because the all-electric car only has an 132-kilometer range—as well as plot a route to that plug.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Such demand response is different from using electric vehicle batteries as a form of storage or backup for the electricity grid, which can put undue strain on batteries as they constantly cycle from fully charged to nearly drained. Demand response doesn't cycle the battery this way but rather throttles the flow of electrons into the battery when it is recharging. "When you're driving, you're pulling out a lot more kilowatt-hours and putting them back in with braking than anything we could do remotely," Pebbles argues. The idea is to still deliver what the customer wants: a fully charged car and electricity bill savings via some kind of payment from the utilities or grid operators that benefit from the reduction in demand.

Of course remote control of your car may seem a little off-putting at first, especially because it could be done invisibly, but "we would never do this without customer consent," Pebbles promises, noting that the program will be entirely opt-in. "Anything we do there has to have a benefit in it for the customer. If not, there's no reason to do it." One hope is to coordinate EV charging with the electricity pulled from the rooftop solar panels on many of the homes in the new development, although that would require the cars to be home during the day.

In order to provide a benefit to the customer and GM, someone—whether a utility or grid operator—will have to pay for the service. "How we find value we're still working through," Pebbles admits, although any payment would further defray the extra cost of purchasing an EV. "You are more likely to see EVs as a second car for many Americans when they are cheaper," noted Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander in February at the third summit of the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy, a government agency that is working on better batteries. "Most of the cost is in the battery."

As it stands, the first rollout of the program is giving the computer code, or smart-grid APIs (application programming interfaces), for the GM EVs to utilities to develop software applications for it as well as a control app for smartphones to some of the Volt drivers. The app—dubbed EcoHub—shows how much energy your home is using on a daily, weekly or monthly basis and exactly how much of that goes to charging the electric car. That is, in part, to start to reveal to electric car owners what the real benefits and costs of owning such a vehicle are. "Later on it will show, if they agree, that we will control their charging," Pebbles explains. The U.S. Department of Energy figures that the average gallon of gasoline in the country costs $3.65 while the average electric equivalent is just $1.14.

Electric cars only make up some 0.3 percent of new car sales at present, but as the vehicles continue to drop in price, new owners may find themselves in demand for intelligent energy management. "The EV will be a new lifestyle," argued Kerstin Meerwaldt, who heads BMW's Corporate Strategy and Planning, at the 2013 Bloomberg New Energy Finance Summit in April. "Everyone who has ever tried an electric car will be convinced,” she said, before quickly revising her estimate—“at least 90 percent."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe