Removing the Waste on the Wood Turner's Screw Chuck, Removing a Plug from Blind Holes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


WHEN the wood turner is turning drops or thin rosettes which are fastened on the screw chuck, there is not much wood left to grasp in removing. The wood turner, with the chisel resting on the rest, catches. the point in the outer part of the rosette Removing a rosette from the chuck. on the back side of the lathe. With a quick pull on the belt with his left hand he revolves the lathe backward which readily unscrews the rosette from the chuck. All the stub pieces which are left on the chuck from other turnings are removed likewise. Removing a Plug from Blind Holes THE shank of a drill chuck was twisted off close to the end of the chuck, and it was quite a problem to get the end of the shank out, so the following little kink was tried: A 14-inch hole was drilled endwise through the broken piece. The hole extended through the plug into the open space at the bottom of the hole. The hole was then filled with oil, and a 14-inch pin was made, so it would slide freely therein. The pin was placed in the hole, and then was struck a heavy blow with a hammer, causing the oil that was at the bottom of the hole to force the plug out.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 105 Issue 18This article was published with the title “Removing the Waste on the Wood Turner's Screw Chuck, Removing a Plug from Blind Holes” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 105 No. 18 (), p. 392
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican10281911-392b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe