New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Replenished Ozone

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The ozone layer is no longer disappearing. Depletion of stratospheric ozone, which defends the planet from harmful levels of ultraviolet rays, was first detected 25 years ago and stems mostly from industrial pollutants, especially chlorofluorocarbons. Atmospheric scientists analyzed data on the entire ozone layer from satellites and ground stations and found ozone level decline plateaued between 1996 and 2002. The ozone layer has even increased a small amount in parts of the Northern Hemisphere, including much of the area over North America, Europe and Asia. Study co-author Betsy Weatherhead of the University of Colorado at Boulder says that more recent data, through this past August, “absolutely are in agreement with the general conclusions of the paper,” which appears in the August 31 Journal of Geophysical Research. Overall, however, ozone will remain seriously depleted worldwide, especially at the poles, because ozonedestroying chemicals persist in the atmosphere for decades.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Replenished Ozone” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 5 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1105-34b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe