New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Reprintable Paper Offers Sustainable Alternative to the Printed Word

A new nanoparticle coating technique prints text that lasts up to five days 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Despite the ubiquity of tablet computers and e-readers, we simply cannot erase our addiction to paper. An estimated four billion trees are felled every year to make paper or cardboard, an energy-intensive process with a vast environmental footprint. Now chemist Yadong Yin of the University of California, Riverside, and his colleagues have developed “rewritable” paper that could help curb that impact.

The researchers coated conventional paper with nanoparticles of two chemicals: Prussian blue, the pigment that gives blueprints their characteristic color, and titanium dioxide, a substance used in sunscreens. A blast of ultraviolet light makes the titanium dioxide nanoparticles donate electrons to their Prussian blue neighbors. That jolts the pigment into shifting its color from midnight blue to milky white.

By shining that UV light through a transparent screen marked with black text, the researchers “printed” blue text on a white background. The text lasts about five days and then spontaneously fades away: “Every morning I could just push a button, and a printer would give me a fresh newspaper to read over breakfast,” Yin says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The paper can also be reset by heating and reused more than 80 times, a significant improvement over previous types of rewritable paper. “The key advantages are high reversibility and stability, easy handling, low cost and low toxicity,” says Sean X. Zhang, a materials scientist at Jilin University in China, who was not involved in the study but has also worked on developing rewritable paper. By comparison, technologies such as electronic ink—used for Amazon's Kindle Paperwhite—involve moving charged black-and-white particles around, which requires electronics.

Since reporting their invention in Nano Letters early this year, the scientists have MacGyvered a digital projector to replace their transparent screen. They are now working on increasing the number of times the paper can be reused. Zhang says a key hurdle will be persuading companies to develop the unconventional UV zappers needed for widespread use. Even though commercialization could be a few years away, Yin says, “We've had a lot of discussions with industry investors.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe