Rescuing Ancient Art from Microbes

An effort to develop new products to conserve a collection of lithographs has revealed two new species of fungi

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists in Costa Rica have found some new species of fungi thriving in an odd place: on a collection of lithographs by 19th-century French artist Bernard Romain Julien. The microorganisms are speeding the degradation of the printed artworks, which are among the oldest items in the University of Costa Rica's art collection and were acquired as a tool to teach drawing techniques.

To preserve the lithographs, Geraldine Conejo-Barboza, a researcher at the university's chemistry department and its Institute of Art Research, and her colleagues are developing a spray that could eliminate or slow the fungi's growth and stop natural acidification processes that are destroying the artwork. “Our idea is to take the biomolecule hydroxyapatite, which has been reported to improve the acidity of paper, and develop a hybrid [molecule] that can also eliminate the fungi,” Conejo-Barboza says. She plans to add zinc oxide and zinc ions to the molecule's surface to act as antifungal agents.

Before applying a medicine, however, one must identify the disease. To find out what microbes are attacking the artwork, Max Chavarría, a molecular biologist at Costa Rica's National Center for Biotechnological Innovation, studied 20 out of more than 1,000 lithographs in the collection. He extracted 21 fungi samples, two of which were unknown to science. “It was a surprise to find two new species in such a limited environment,” Chavarría says. The discovered species, Periconia epilithographicola and Coniochaeta cipronana, were described in May in Scientific Reports.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Conejo-Barboza has already synthesized a few fungi-fighting products that she aims to test in the laboratory. Salomón Chaves, subdirector of the Institute of Research in Art, has spent the past five years restoring the lithographs. The new product has the advantage of being a spray, he says. Protecting paper from acidification currently requires bathing it in alkaline substances and then carefully drying it—which can shrink the paper if not done correctly. The researchers hope the new chemicals will fight the microbes and acidification effectively and prove useful for preserving collections elsewhere.

Such fungi are not all bad, however: their ability to degrade cellulose—a tough substance found in plant cell walls—could be useful for treating agricultural waste from crops such as pineapple, coffee and sugarcane.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe