Research Finds Thieving Birds More Distrustful than Honest Ones

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new study suggests that in the case of pilfering scrub jays, the old adage "it takes one to know one" rings true. The report, published in the current issue of Nature, reveals that birds with a history of helping themselves to others' food stores are more likely than their honest counterparts to move their cache if another bird knows its location.

Nathan J. Emery and Nicola S. Clayton of the University of Cambridge observed 21 jays in a variety of food-storing situations. The birds received a supply of worms and were given access to sand-filled caching trays both under the watchful eye of another bird and while the other bird's view was obstructed. The researchers later allowed the birds access to their stored food in private. They found that the birds re-cached significantly more items if they had been observed during their first hiding foray. What is more, birds with no experience stealing from hidden reserves belonging to other birds moved their food supply significantly less often than did thieving birds, regardless of whether they were watched. These findings, the scientists report, "suggest that jays relate information about their previous experience as a pilferer to the possibility of future stealing by another bird, and modify their caching strategy accordingly."

Additional study of cache recovery, the authors note, provides an opportunity to further examine whether mental time travel and mental attribution¿traits thought to be unique to humans¿are in fact shared by other animals. "To our knowledge," they conclude, "this is the first experimental demonstration that a non-human animal can remember the social context of specific past events, and adjust their present behavior to avoid potentially detrimental consequences in the future, in this case pilfering."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe