New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Research Illuminates Mysterious Pregnancy Complication

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Preeclampsia afflicts one in 20 expectant mothers. A predecessor of eclampsia, which brings on fatal seizures, the condition is difficult to predict and hard to treat--often the only course of action is an early delivery. Doctors still don't understand exactly what causes preeclampsia, but two studies published today in the Journal of Clinical Investigation provide new insight into how the disease arises and could point to novel therapies.

Sharon E. Maynard of Harvard Medical School and her colleagues determined that women suffering from preeclampsia display elevated levels of a protein known as sFlt1, which is produced by the placenta. This protein binds to two growth factors--vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF)--that promote the development of new blood vessels and the maintenance of the vascular system. According to the report, high levels of sFlt1 could result in a compromised vascular system by reducing the available amount of these growth factors in the blood supply. In rats, high levels of sFlt1 led to symptoms reminiscent of preeclampsia in humans, regardless of whether or not the animals were pregnant. Taking that into consideration, the authors suggest that excess circulating sFlt1 contributes to the condition.

In related work, Susan Quaggin of Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto and her co-workers investigated the link between one type of VEGF and kidney disease. They found that reducing the level of VEGF-A in mouse kidney cells caused kidney failure very similar to that seen in women suffering from preeclampsia. Together the two studies indicate a plausible new scenario for what causes the disorder. In an accompanying commentary, Aernout Luttun and Peter Carmeliet of Katholieke University in Belgium note that "at the very least, these studies raise new hopes that novel strategies may be designed to combat preeclampsia and thereby improve the chances of the mother and child for a healthy future."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe