Research Illuminates Mysterious Pregnancy Complication

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Preeclampsia afflicts one in 20 expectant mothers. A predecessor of eclampsia, which brings on fatal seizures, the condition is difficult to predict and hard to treat--often the only course of action is an early delivery. Doctors still don't understand exactly what causes preeclampsia, but two studies published today in the Journal of Clinical Investigation provide new insight into how the disease arises and could point to novel therapies.

Sharon E. Maynard of Harvard Medical School and her colleagues determined that women suffering from preeclampsia display elevated levels of a protein known as sFlt1, which is produced by the placenta. This protein binds to two growth factors--vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF)--that promote the development of new blood vessels and the maintenance of the vascular system. According to the report, high levels of sFlt1 could result in a compromised vascular system by reducing the available amount of these growth factors in the blood supply. In rats, high levels of sFlt1 led to symptoms reminiscent of preeclampsia in humans, regardless of whether or not the animals were pregnant. Taking that into consideration, the authors suggest that excess circulating sFlt1 contributes to the condition.

In related work, Susan Quaggin of Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto and her co-workers investigated the link between one type of VEGF and kidney disease. They found that reducing the level of VEGF-A in mouse kidney cells caused kidney failure very similar to that seen in women suffering from preeclampsia. Together the two studies indicate a plausible new scenario for what causes the disorder. In an accompanying commentary, Aernout Luttun and Peter Carmeliet of Katholieke University in Belgium note that "at the very least, these studies raise new hopes that novel strategies may be designed to combat preeclampsia and thereby improve the chances of the mother and child for a healthy future."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe