Research Reveals Brain Signal That Roots for Reward

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Encouraging words from a cheerleader can convince someone to keep at an arduous task in order to reap benefits once the chore is completed. Now the results of a study published today in the journal Science suggest that a part of the brain might work in a similar way. According to the report, scientists have discovered a brain signal in monkeys that increases as an expected reward nears. The findings could help unravel how the compulsion characteristic of addiction takes shape in the brain.

Munetaka Shidara of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology in Japan and Barry J. Richmond of the National Institute of Mental Health monitored monkeys while the animals performed a series of tasks in order to receive a reward. The animals learned to release a lever when a spot on a computer screen turned from red to green. After a number of successful attempts, they received their prize. In some of the trials, a bar on the screen tracked their progress and got brighter as the animals approached the reward. As the monkeys performed the tasks, the scientists investigated the activity of more than 100 neurons located in the anterior cingulate cortex, a region of the brain involved in performance and conflict monitoring, error detection, and response selection.

The activity of about one third of the brain cells, the team found, varied with the level of expectation of a reward--the closer the reward seemed, the more they fired. The animals also made the fewest errors in the task just prior to receiving their reward. When the possibility of receiving a reward was randomized, however, these neurons did not display increasing activity. Of particular note is the fact that the signal actually died down just before the prize was reached. "Understanding the reward is a 'sure thing' may be more important than actually receiving it," Richmond says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This cheerleading brain signal could form a biological basis for goal-driven behavior. "Understanding how this signal works normally, as well as when its activity is abnormally high or low, may shed light on why individuals seem to have different levels of motivation for performing similar tasks," Shidara notes. Moreover, the researchers propose that misfiring of this reward expectancy circuit could be involved in some pathological behaviors. "Let's assume you had a signal like this, and it was turned up too high," Richmond explains. "It might make you feel like you had to be trying harder, telling you, 'Just go a little further and you'll get satisfied.' Our speculation is that this signal never resolves for conditions like [obsessive-compulsive disorder]."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe