Research Reveals Earth's Unsymmetrical Auroras

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Data collected from two NASA spacecraft have revealed that Earth's northern and southern auroras are not simply mirror images of one another, as previously believed.

Nearly circular bands, called auroral ovals, surround both poles of our planet. They result from the interaction between Earth's magnetic field, or magnetosphere, and energized particles from the solar wind that emit light in the upper atmosphere. A research team led by Timothy J. Stubbs of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center analyzed images from NASA's Polar spacecraft and the IMAGE spacecraft taken of both the northern (aurora borealis) and southern (aurora australis) lights. "This is the first analysis to use simultaneous observations of the whole aurora in both the Northern and Southern hemispheres to track their locations," Stubbs remarks.

During the study period, the researchers noted that the auroras tilted and changed based on how the planet's magnetic field is oriented toward the sun. "Because Earth's magnetic field is not a perfect dipole," Stubbs says, "we think this fact plays some role in causing the auroras to not be mirror images of each other."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe