Research Suggests That Memory Decline Begins in Mid-20s

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although the effects may not surface for years, memory starts to decline around age 25. So says a University of Michigan researcher who will present her findings next week at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Psychologist Denise Park studied more than 350 people between the ages of 20 and 90. Noticeable decreases in cognitive ability, she found, were already apparent in subjects in their 20s. "Younger adults in their 20s and 30s notice no losses at all, even though they are declining at the same rate as people in their 60s and 70s, because they have more capital than they need," she explains. Memory decline does become noticeable once patients reach their mid-60s, however, and it begins to affect everyday activities. Increases in experience and general knowledge that accompany age tend to offset the initial losses, Park notes, with the junction occurring around 50 years of age.

Despite the somewhat discouraging nature of her new findings, Park remains optimistic about potential treatments to improve memory. "It¿s likely that just as diet and exercise help to keep our bodies fit and healthy, we¿ll find ways to improve the functioning of our aging minds."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe