New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Research Suggests That Memory Decline Begins in Mid-20s

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although the effects may not surface for years, memory starts to decline around age 25. So says a University of Michigan researcher who will present her findings next week at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Psychologist Denise Park studied more than 350 people between the ages of 20 and 90. Noticeable decreases in cognitive ability, she found, were already apparent in subjects in their 20s. "Younger adults in their 20s and 30s notice no losses at all, even though they are declining at the same rate as people in their 60s and 70s, because they have more capital than they need," she explains. Memory decline does become noticeable once patients reach their mid-60s, however, and it begins to affect everyday activities. Increases in experience and general knowledge that accompany age tend to offset the initial losses, Park notes, with the junction occurring around 50 years of age.

Despite the somewhat discouraging nature of her new findings, Park remains optimistic about potential treatments to improve memory. "It¿s likely that just as diet and exercise help to keep our bodies fit and healthy, we¿ll find ways to improve the functioning of our aging minds."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe