Research Unravels Mystery of Martian Meteorites

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The most famous Martian meteorite, ALHA84001, received attention because of the possibility that it houses ancient bacteria. But other rocks from the Red Planet have survived the long interplanetary journey to end up on Earth, too. Scientists were stumped, however, as to why the majority of these meteorites were relatively young compared to Mars's age. New findings published today in the journal Science can help explain the characteristics of the Martian meteorites.

Analysis of the Martian rocks indicated that they were ejected by six or seven separate impact events. Previous tests had predicted that a collision with an asteroid large enough to leave a crater 12-kilometers wide would be needed to send the meteorites to Earth. Because such huge impacts are extremely rare, it was unlikely that enough of them could have occurred to explain our planet's Martian meteorite collection. Now the higher-resolution models developed by James N. Head of the University of Arizona and his colleagues show that collisions that cause craters only three kilometers across can launch 10 million fragments, each about 10 centimeters across, into space. This distribution would be sufficient to expect some of them to show up on Earth, the scientists report. In addition, they found that sections of the planet that are covered by debris (which are likely to be made up of older terrain) would require larger, and hence rarer, impacts. As a result, meteorites that reach Earth are biased toward younger ages.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe