Researcher Pinpoints Cause of King Herod's Death

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

More than 2,000 years after his death, medical detective work has revealed what most likely killed Herod the Great. According to the Bible, the tyrannical ruler of ancient Judea ordered numerous executions during his reign¿including those of countless newborn males during the infamous Slaughter of the Innocents¿but the cause of his own demise has long eluded scholars. The new findings, presented last Friday at the historical Clinical Pathological Conference in Baltimore, suggest that he succumbed to a combination of chronic kidney disease and an unusual genital infection.

Written accounts of Herod's last days indicate that the king suffered from respiratory and intestinal problems, severe itching, widespread convulsions and gangrene of the genitalia. Earlier diagnoses had pointed to gonorrhea, but when Jan Hirschmann of the University of Washington considered the symptoms, he found them to be most compatible with chronic kidney disease. Only one symptom¿gangrene of the genitalia¿did not fit with that assessment. Taking that into account, Hirschmann says he "finally concluded that the most likely explanation was that his chronic kidney disease was complicated by an unusual infection of the male genitalia called Fournier's gangrene."

The King Herod diagnosis is the latest in a series of case studies of prominent historical figures discussed at the annual conference. Previous subjects include Edgar Allan Poe, Alexander the Great and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American