Researcher Proposes That Food Contaminant Causes Testicular Cancer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The probable causes of testicular cancer have long eluded scientists. What they do know is that it most often strikes men between the ages of 15 and 34, and that northern Europe¿notably Denmark¿has the highest incidence of the disease. Now a new hypothesis may explain that pattern. According to a report published in the February issue of the journal Cancer Causes and Control, a toxin found in contaminated cereal grains, pork products and coffee could be the culprit.

That toxin, says Wake Forest University researcher Gary G. Schwartz, is ochratoxin A (OTA), a by-product of molds that grow on a variety of plant products and grains (especially rye) and a known carcinogen in animals. When animals consume the moldy grains, they also ingest the OTA. Pork products in particular exhibit high levels of contamination, and citizens of Denmark, Schwartz notes, consume the most pork products and rye per-capita in Europe.

Schwartz proposes that individuals are exposed to OTA either in early childhood or in the womb. Once internalized, he hypothesizes, the OTA damages the testicular DNA. This alteration then lies dormant until testicular growth during puberty, when the cancer begins to grow.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Further analysis of the effect of OTA when present in high levels in the diet of mothers and their male children is necessary, Schwartz concludes. But should future research bear his suspicions out, certain compounds known to inhibit OTA¿s effects in animals¿aspirin and vitamins A, C and E, for example¿might offer similar protective effects to humans.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American