New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Researcher Proposes That Food Contaminant Causes Testicular Cancer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The probable causes of testicular cancer have long eluded scientists. What they do know is that it most often strikes men between the ages of 15 and 34, and that northern Europe¿notably Denmark¿has the highest incidence of the disease. Now a new hypothesis may explain that pattern. According to a report published in the February issue of the journal Cancer Causes and Control, a toxin found in contaminated cereal grains, pork products and coffee could be the culprit.

That toxin, says Wake Forest University researcher Gary G. Schwartz, is ochratoxin A (OTA), a by-product of molds that grow on a variety of plant products and grains (especially rye) and a known carcinogen in animals. When animals consume the moldy grains, they also ingest the OTA. Pork products in particular exhibit high levels of contamination, and citizens of Denmark, Schwartz notes, consume the most pork products and rye per-capita in Europe.

Schwartz proposes that individuals are exposed to OTA either in early childhood or in the womb. Once internalized, he hypothesizes, the OTA damages the testicular DNA. This alteration then lies dormant until testicular growth during puberty, when the cancer begins to grow.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Further analysis of the effect of OTA when present in high levels in the diet of mothers and their male children is necessary, Schwartz concludes. But should future research bear his suspicions out, certain compounds known to inhibit OTA¿s effects in animals¿aspirin and vitamins A, C and E, for example¿might offer similar protective effects to humans.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe