New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Researchers Develop Bomb-Sniffing Polymer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have developed a novel polymer device that can pick up on trace amounts of explosive vapors. The work, described in today's issue of the journal Nature, could "deliver sensors that can detect explosives with unparalleled sensitivity," its inventors suggest.

Aimée Rose and her colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology used a type of compound known as a semiconducting organic polymer (SOP) in their design. When exposed to laser light, this type of compound subsequently produces its own additional laser light--a process called lasing. Molecules of explosives such as trinitrotoluene (TNT) are deficient in electrons and are attracted to the electron-rich polymer. When they stick to the surface, they interfere with the lasing and the SOP's light output decreases as a result. By measuring the change in lasing, the scientists were able to detect TNT at concentrations as low as five parts per billion. The team also successfully identified dinitrotoluene (DNT) at 100 parts per billion in just one second of detection time.

The detector is relatively immune to interference, the researchers report, noting no response was recorded in the presence of molecules such as benzene or naphthalene. SOPs had previously been used to locate buried land mines; the new design, however, offers a 30-fold increase in sensitivity over previous ones.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe