Researchers Distinguish Two Types of Visual Afterimages

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: ©SCIENCE

Take this test. In the top image to the right, you will find a small white dot just below the center of the figure. Stare at that dot for 10 to 20 seconds and then shift your gaze to the dot in the empty space to the right. Now what do you see? If you see anything at all, you most likely see one of the figures shown in the bottom image: gray disks, turquoise Pacmen or a turquoise square. Reporting in today's issue of Science, Shinsuke Shimojo of the California Institute of Technology and NTT Communication Science Laboratory and colleagues suggest that not all of these afterimages come from the same place. Some, they say, are generated within the eye, but others stem from perceptual adaptations in the brain.

Researchers long assumed that the bleaching of photochemical pigments or neural adaptation within the retina caused afterimages in response to visual stimuli. The first two figures in the bottom image are examples of such local, or eye-based, visions. But in a series of careful experiments with five subjects, Shimojo and team demonstrated that some afterimages¿such as the turquoise square¿are filled in more globally by perception. This square, though perceived by way of suggestion in the original image, does not actually exist among the white disks and red pie wedges. But adaptation in the brain's cortical neural circuits produces the square as an afterimage.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe