Researchers Explain Behavior of Space Radiation

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the summer action film The Fantastic Four, intrepid space travelers are exposed to an intense radiation burst that gives them superpowers--from immense strength to invisibility--once they return to Earth. That premise is science fiction, but radiation encircling our planet does affect both astronauts and orbiting satellites. The activity of the two Van Allen radiation belts has now been explained in a report that should help scientists better predict their behavior and reduce the risk to humans and spacecraft.

Charged particles trapped inside our planet's magnetic field make up the Van Allen radiation belts, located almost 20,000 kilometers above Earth. Solar storms increase the activity in these regions, but what causes the variation in the number of charged particles was unclear. Richard B. Horne of the British Antarctic Survey and his colleagues analyzed data collected during two rare space storms in the winter of 2003 in which sections of the Van Allen belts were drained of electrons. "When the radiation belts reformed they did not increase according to a long-held theory of particle acceleration," Horne explains. "By using scientific instruments in Antarctica and on the CLUSTER mission satellites, we showed that very low frequency radio waves caused the particle acceleration and intensified the belts."

Over one to two days, this wave acceleration can increase the intensity of charged particles by more than three orders of magnitude, the scientists write in a report published today in the journal Nature. "The new information will help spacecraft operators and space weather forecasters who must predict when satellites and missions are most at risk from radiation events," Horne notes, "allowing them to take measures to protect instruments and systems from damage, and astronauts from risks to their health."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe