Researchers Find Brain Receptors Linked to Mother-Infant Bonding

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Morphine acts on a part of the brain known as the opioid system, which is linked to pain, pleasure and addictive behaviors. The results of a mouse study published in today's issue of the journal Science suggest that the same brain circuitry plays a role in mother-infant bonding.

Previous animal research had implicated the opioid system in the forming of lasting attachments but exactly how it did this was unclear. In the new work, Francesca R. D'Amato of the CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Psychobiology and Psychopharmacology in Rome and her colleagues studied so-called knockout mice that lacked u-opioid receptors. The team observed newborn pups that had been separated from their mothers and found that mice lacking the receptors made fewer distress calls when they were abandoned than normal mice did. When the control animals were given morphine they calmed down, but the drug had no effect on the knockout mice. The researchers also gave the animals a choice between two cages, one they had been exposed to before and one that was unfamiliar. Whereas the normal mice all chose the familiar surroundings, two thirds of the knockout animals seemed content to bed down in a strange mother's nest.

The results suggest that u-opioid receptors are ¿critical players in attachment disorders,¿ the scientists note. In addition, they lend further support to the theory that malfunction of the opioid system could be to blame for the social indifference seen in autistic infants.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe