Researchers Identify Anthrax Resistance Gene in Mice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

While fear of a terrorist biological attack in the U.S. escalates, researchers have made progress in understanding how the anthrax bacterium causes disease. Described in the October issue of the journal Current Biology, the new findings could eventually lead to therapies for the often fatal infection.

William F. Dietrich of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and his colleagues discovered that mice with certain forms of a gene known as Kif1C are resistant to anthrax. Anthrax launches its attack on the body by first wiping out immune system cells called macrophages. But the different forms of the transportation protein made by the resistant Kif1C gene variants appear to protect the macrophages, perhaps by sequestering the toxin in a region of the cell where it can be eliminated. Although the subtle mutations in the resistant variants probably don't affect the macrophages in their normal functioning, Dietrich notes, in the presence of anthrax toxin their effects "can mean the difference between death and survival of the macrophage."

Several of the team's experiments made the effects of the resistant Kif1C variants, or alleles, especially clear. Inserting a resistant allele into susceptible macrophages made the cells more resistant to anthrax. In contrast, when the researchers treated resistant macrophages with a drug known to prevent the Kif1C protein from reaching its target destination, the cells yielded to the toxin. "Research by other groups has indicated that anthrax toxin kills macrophages by inducing a runaway reaction called an oxidative burst," Dietrich remarks. "We speculate that [the Kif1C protein] might be transporting either the elements that are part of this oxidative burst, or the actual oxidative compounds themselves. Or the protein may be ensuring the prompt and appropriate delivery of compounds that protect the macrophage against its own oxidative burst."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kif1C is known to exist and vary in humans. But whether any of these human variants confer comparable anthrax resistance remains to be seen. "We intend to look for these variations in human populations, to figure out what cargo this protein is carrying, and to learn why Kif1C is activated under anthrax intoxication," Dietrich asserts. "Once we understand such phenomena, we might be able to work toward clinical applications in terms of better diagnostics and treatments."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe