New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Researchers Unveil Smallest Atomic Clock Yet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists have manufactured the world's smallest atomic clock, with inner machinery about the size of a grain of rice. Requiring very little power to run, the device loses only one second every 300 years and could one day provide precise timekeeping for portable applications such as wireless communication devices and Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers.

Like other atomic clocks, the new design relies on the natural vibrations of cesium atoms, which ¿tick¿ 9.2 billion times each second. John Kitching of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and his colleagues trapped cesium vapor inside a chamber that is probed by a tiny laser, resulting in two electromagnetic fields. The team then adjusted the fields until the difference between them equaled that of the energy levels within the cesium atoms, causing the atoms to stop absorbing or emitting light. An external oscillator was then stabilized against the natural resonance frequency of cesium. ¿The real power of our technique is that we're able to run the clock on so little electrical power that it could be battery operated and that it's small enough to be easily incorporated into a cell phone or some other kind of handheld device,¿ explains Kitching. ¿And nothing else like it even comes close as far as being mass producible.¿

Although it's about 100 times smaller, the minuscule clock is not as accurate as larger atomic clocks, which can reach up to two meters in height. But it could still offer a nearly 1,000-fold improvement in long-term precision compared to quartz crystals currently used for small-scale applications. The researchers describe the novel clock in the latest issue of Applied Physics Letters.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe