New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Researchers Use DNA to Track Illegal Ivory Trade

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have developed a new technique that can trace DNA from African elephants to within a few hundred kilometers of its geographic origin. Applying the method to DNA taken from illegally traded ivory could help limit the poaching of these endangered animals for their tusks. The work is described in a report published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Samuel Wasser of the University of Washington and his colleagues started by collecting DNA from nearly 400 elephants at 28 reference sites across Africa. They extracted some DNA from tissue samples, but they also sampled dung, which is faster and less stressful for the animals, according to Wasser. The geographic variation of specific DNA markers was then mapped separately for savanna and forest elephants, which appear to be two separate species.

Conventional tracing techniques can only show which reference sites a new DNA sample matches best, Wasser says, but ¿chances are it didn't come from any of those locations.¿ He and his team developed new statistical methods that generate a swarm of likely locations. For a sample taken from one of the reference sites, all of the likely origins were close by. Even when the reference DNA from that site was excluded, the possibilities clustered within a few hundred kilometers of the actual origin. Wasser hopes that the results will stimulate people to collect more reference samples, especially in the forests of central Africa, to improve the technique's precision.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Once a map is created, tracing a single ivory sample costs about $100, plus labor. Wasser's team is currently analyzing a 6.5-metric-ton cache of ivory seized two years ago in Singapore. Knowing where that ivory came from should focus both legal and political efforts to prevent further poaching in the area of origin.

More importantly, Wasser says, the technique should clarify how policy changes affect poaching. In 1989, after the number of African elephants had declined from 1.3 million to 600,000 in less than a decade, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) banned all international trade in ivory. CITES has recently allowed the resumption of some trade from southern Africa, where the elephant population is relatively healthy, and may make further changes when it meets in Thailand next month. Critics worry that smugglers can bring tusks into southern Africa from other regions. When they do, the new DNA-based methods should be able to help track them down.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe