Researchers Use DNA to Track Illegal Ivory Trade

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have developed a new technique that can trace DNA from African elephants to within a few hundred kilometers of its geographic origin. Applying the method to DNA taken from illegally traded ivory could help limit the poaching of these endangered animals for their tusks. The work is described in a report published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Samuel Wasser of the University of Washington and his colleagues started by collecting DNA from nearly 400 elephants at 28 reference sites across Africa. They extracted some DNA from tissue samples, but they also sampled dung, which is faster and less stressful for the animals, according to Wasser. The geographic variation of specific DNA markers was then mapped separately for savanna and forest elephants, which appear to be two separate species.

Conventional tracing techniques can only show which reference sites a new DNA sample matches best, Wasser says, but ¿chances are it didn't come from any of those locations.¿ He and his team developed new statistical methods that generate a swarm of likely locations. For a sample taken from one of the reference sites, all of the likely origins were close by. Even when the reference DNA from that site was excluded, the possibilities clustered within a few hundred kilometers of the actual origin. Wasser hopes that the results will stimulate people to collect more reference samples, especially in the forests of central Africa, to improve the technique's precision.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Once a map is created, tracing a single ivory sample costs about $100, plus labor. Wasser's team is currently analyzing a 6.5-metric-ton cache of ivory seized two years ago in Singapore. Knowing where that ivory came from should focus both legal and political efforts to prevent further poaching in the area of origin.

More importantly, Wasser says, the technique should clarify how policy changes affect poaching. In 1989, after the number of African elephants had declined from 1.3 million to 600,000 in less than a decade, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) banned all international trade in ivory. CITES has recently allowed the resumption of some trade from southern Africa, where the elephant population is relatively healthy, and may make further changes when it meets in Thailand next month. Critics worry that smugglers can bring tusks into southern Africa from other regions. When they do, the new DNA-based methods should be able to help track them down.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe