New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Researchers Warn Sumatran Tiger May Disappear

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Poaching and illegal trade are forcing the last tiger species in Indonesia toward extinction, a new report warns. The findings, compiled by the wildlife trade monitoring network TRAFFIC and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), indicate that 50 Sumatran tigers have been poached each year between 1998 and 2002, leaving less than 500 of the creatures in the wild.

Indonesia has already lost two tiger species: Javan tigers went extinct in the 1980s, whereas Bali tigers lasted only until the 1930s. The Sumatran tiger is currently protected by law, but the threat of fines and jail sentences is not enough to stop the substantial trade in tiger parts, note Nolan Magnus and Chris R. Shepard, the authors of the report. Many of the animal¿s parts are sold for use in traditional medicine, and their skins are highly valued as well. Undercover investigations discovered tiger parts for sale in 17 of 24 towns. Overall, 20 percent of the shops visited sold tiger parts, particularly teeth and claws sold as charms or decoration. "Increased and improved enforcement is the only thing that is going to save Sumatran tigers," Shepard says.

In addition to poaching, the animals are threatened by loss of habitat. According to the report, just 8 percent of the tiger¿s habitat is protected, and logging and settlement have limited its overall range to just a quarter of the island. "Tigers all around the world are under threat from poaching, loss of habitat and conflict with nearby human populations," says Susan Lieberman, director of WWF¿s international Species Program. "Now the Sumatran tiger is on the brink of extinction. With so few left, there are doubts about whether the population is still viable."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe