Researchers Warn Sumatran Tiger May Disappear

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Poaching and illegal trade are forcing the last tiger species in Indonesia toward extinction, a new report warns. The findings, compiled by the wildlife trade monitoring network TRAFFIC and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), indicate that 50 Sumatran tigers have been poached each year between 1998 and 2002, leaving less than 500 of the creatures in the wild.

Indonesia has already lost two tiger species: Javan tigers went extinct in the 1980s, whereas Bali tigers lasted only until the 1930s. The Sumatran tiger is currently protected by law, but the threat of fines and jail sentences is not enough to stop the substantial trade in tiger parts, note Nolan Magnus and Chris R. Shepard, the authors of the report. Many of the animal¿s parts are sold for use in traditional medicine, and their skins are highly valued as well. Undercover investigations discovered tiger parts for sale in 17 of 24 towns. Overall, 20 percent of the shops visited sold tiger parts, particularly teeth and claws sold as charms or decoration. "Increased and improved enforcement is the only thing that is going to save Sumatran tigers," Shepard says.

In addition to poaching, the animals are threatened by loss of habitat. According to the report, just 8 percent of the tiger¿s habitat is protected, and logging and settlement have limited its overall range to just a quarter of the island. "Tigers all around the world are under threat from poaching, loss of habitat and conflict with nearby human populations," says Susan Lieberman, director of WWF¿s international Species Program. "Now the Sumatran tiger is on the brink of extinction. With so few left, there are doubts about whether the population is still viable."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe