Retroviruses Cross Little Bridges to Infect New Cells

New mechanism for cell-to-cell transmission of viruses could provide a target for limiting infection rate

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers at Yale University's School of Medicine have discovered a novel mechanism by which viruses infect neighboring cells. Their discovery, appearing in this week's Nature Cell Biology could lead to new antiviral therapies.

Previous studies found that viruses are ferried from infected to healthy cells by dendritic cells, which are cells that can transport germs without becoming infected themselves. Cell-to-cell transfer of a virus (as opposed to a virus jumping from one infected cell to another) is believed to be as much as 1,000 times more effective at spreading pathogens.

The new study, led by Walter Mothes, a Yale microbial pathogens expert, involved creating one culture that mixed healthy rat cells with cells infected by the murine leukemia virus, a cancerous pathogen in rats and monkeys that is not known to affect humans. The researchers then watched as filopodialong, thin, short-lived filaments on the outside of uninfected cellslatched onto viral cells, stabilized and then allowed viral particles to shimmy across the makeshift spans to spread.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Who would have thought that viruses would induce long, thin cell fingers and walk along them?" says Mothes, who notes that the original purpose of this study was to visualize the infectious synapse mechanism, not to view an alternative method of viral transfer. "That the dynamic and short-lived filopodia can be transformed into long and stable bridges is amazing."

Filopodia have also been observed during wing formation in fruit flies. In this newly discovered viral infection mechanism, uninfected cells cast filopodia about in serum until they encounter cells expressing viral envelope protein. Signals from within the two cells then activate the protein actin, which elongates the bridge. Infected cells draw the filopodia in and actually suck in the tips of the filaments. Then, according to Mothes, "viruses 'surf' along filopodia to efficiently infect cells by using the underlying retrograde flow of actin."

Mothes does not believe this mechanismwhich the researchers showed also works with the HIV virus and avian leucosis (a pathogen that causes paralysis in poultry)is a substitute for infectious synapses. "Both must exist, but how they are related to each other needs to be figured out," he says. "Filopodial contacts may precede synapse formation." Thomas Hope, a molecular biologist at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, believes that dendritic cells may explain the early stages of infection, while filopodial bridges could be the means by which viruses amplify. "I think [the filopodial mechanism] is pretty neat, but it wouldn't surprise me in the end if everything is [a] slightly different version of the same process," he says. "It's probably providing a more detailed look at things that have been seen before."

Mothes says researchers will do an entire culture to confirm their hypothesis that several cycles of viral transmission can result in the spread of an infection. He notes that the filopodial bridges would have to be transient to limit the amount of infection, because too much viral access would kill cells. "Understanding these details may lead to a new target for future antiviral therapies," Mothes adds. "If we find a kinase that regulates filopodial bridge formation or a kinase that facilitates virus surfing along a filopodium," he says, these enzymes can be targeted to thwart infection.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe