New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Return of the Leonids

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each November, the earth's orbit takes it close to dusty flotsam left behind by the comet Tempel-Tuttle, resulting in a celestial show. "Our planet glides through the debris zone every year," explains Bille Cooke of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. "It's like a minefield. Sometimes we hit a dust trail, sometimes we don't." Astronomers are predicting that the early morning hours of November 19th will be the best time to catch this year's display, which will be mainly an east-coast affair.

In recent years, the Leonids have been particularly impressive because the earth intersected with dense streams of leftover debris from Tempel-Tuttle's 33.25-year orbit around the sun. The 2001 storm saw so-called zenith hourly rates (ZHR)--the number of meteors an observer would see overhead under ideal conditions--of between 1,500 and 3,000 meteors. "This year we're going to brush past two of the trails--no direct hits," Cooke says. The first encounter occurred last week, with shower activity peaking on November 13th. Skywatchers in Japan reported seeing about 100 shooting stars an hour. The next rendezvous (with a stream shed by the comet in 1533) holds more promise for observers in the U.S., although only for those in Eastern locations. In the early hours of November 19th, Cooke predicts meteor hunters will see more than one each minute.

Even though this year's display may not seem as promising as those past, it's still a good idea to look skyward. Cooke notes that the Leonids are definitely ramping down in intensity (predictions suggest that the earth won't intersect a really dense Tempel-Tuttle debris stream again until 2098 or 2131). After a small spike expected in 2006, he says, that's about it for the rest of the century.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe