New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Revulsion Arising: Different Forms of Disgust Create Distinctive Physiological Signatures

Our innards differentiate between types of disgust

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Where do our emotions come from? Scientists addressing this long-standing philosophical question recently got some answers by using—bear with us—videos of people licking vomit off their fingers and other revolting scenarios.

Human emotions are associated with measurable changes in heart rate, gut motility and sweat gland secre­tions, but some experts have argued that these bodily responses are simply a general stress reaction and therefore cannot account for different types of emotions. A Journal of Neuroscience study from September 22 suggests otherwise, presenting evidence of distinct physiological signatures of two forms of disgust.

Neuroscientist Neil Harrison and his colleagues at the University of Sussex in England monitored heart rate, stomach contractions and brain activity as study participants viewed videos designed to elicit two kinds of disgust. The vomit video and other gross-out films elicited what is known as core disgust; videos of surgical operations—such as an above-knee amputation—induced body-boundary violation (BBV) disgust. Although both types of videos were judged as equally revolting, core dis­gust evoked strong increases in stomach contrac­tion, whereas BBV elicited increases in heart rate. If these bodily changes form the basis of our emotional experiences, the researchers predicted that disgust-specific brain activity should reflect similar patterns. They found this very type of activity in the insula, an area deep in the brain where infor­mation about the body intersects with that about emotions.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings support the idea that these bodily responses are more than generalized arousal: they can form the outlines of specific emotions. Our own cognitive interpretations of the scene may then add to these physical responses to create a full-fledged emotion. “These bodily responses are not going to be the whole story of where our emotions come from, but they provide a kind of skeleton,” Harrison says. [For more on embodied cognition, see “Body of Thought,” by Siri Carpenter.]

SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Revulsion Arising: Different Forms of Disgust Create Distinctive Physiological Signatures” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 6 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0111-12a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe