New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

RFK, Jr., Says Peanut Allergies May Be Tied to Aluminum in Vaccines and Pesticides. Here’s What the Science Says

Strong evidence suggests that food allergies are caused by a lack of exposure to food allergens—not by exposure to toxins

Bowl of shelled peanuts on a bright blue background

Peter Dazeley/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

At an event on Monday, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., linked peanut allergies in children to environmental toxins such as aluminum in vaccines and pesticides—and not to a lack of early exposure to peanuts.

Peanut allergies had been on the rise over the past few decades but dropped precipitously in recent years—an effect that experts have attributed to guidance issued in 2017 and updated in 2021 that parents should expose their babies to peanuts and other common allergens starting at four to six months of life. Older guidelines had suggested waiting until the age of three.

Kennedy, however, dismissed this evidence, pointing instead to aluminum in vaccines or pesticides in the environment as potential triggers for food allergies. The comments follow a claim from U.S. president Donald Trump in September that aluminum in vaccines is harmful. The Food and Drug Administration announced in October that it is studying the metal’s use.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Aluminum is common in many foods and in the environment. And to boost the body’s immune response, it is added to some vaccines—such as those for human papillomavirus (HPV) and tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (Tdap), as well as some combination vaccines that protect against polio. The amount of aluminum in vaccines is less than that found in infant formula and breast milk and has not been found to be harmful.

Removing aluminum from vaccines would require reformulating them entirely, something that is very unlikely to happen, said Peter Jay Hotez, a vaccine expert at Baylor College of Medicine, in a previous interview with Scientific American.

As for pesticides, there is little strong evidence that they cause food allergies. A 2022 research review suggests a link between pesticide exposure and asthma in children.

There is, however, significant evidence that food allergies, and peanut allergies in particular, are caused by a lack of exposure to the foods in question early in life. A 2015 randomized trial in the New England Journal of Medicine found that kids who were fed peanuts before age five had significantly lower odds of developing a peanut allergy compared with kids whose families were told to avoid exposure.

Scientists also suspect that other factors, such as cesarean sections and antibiotic use, may also play a role in triggering food allergies.

Tanya Lewis was formerly senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She wrote and edited stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appeared on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and wrote Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She held a number of positions over her nearly 10 years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe