Rising CO2 Levels Could Force Shift in Fertilizer Use

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: COURTESY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

Over the past two centuries, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations have risen by nearly 30 percent. Global warming concerns aside, scientists long thought the trend would benefit plants, which use CO2 to manufacture the chemical energy they need. But in recent years, research has shown that it's not quite that simple. For one thing, it appears that although plants initially process the additional CO2, the accelerated assimilation declines after a few days or weeks. Now new research sheds light on why this happens. The findings, published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, could have important implications for crop fertilization.

In laboratory studies of wheat seedlings (right), Arnold Bloom of the University of California, Davis, and colleagues discovered that elevated levels of CO2 inhibited the processing of nitrate fertilizer¿one of two kinds commonly used by farmers. As it turns out, the plant uses the same resources to process CO2 and nitrogen, and it gives priority to CO2. Furthermore, elevated levels of CO2 can block the transfer of nitrite¿the compound the plants produce from nitrate¿into their photosynthesizing structures. The decreased processing of nitrate thus offsets the benefits of increased CO2. Under the same high CO2 conditions, however, the plants made ample use of ammonium-based fertilizer. Indeed, whereas plants receiving nitrate fertilizer increased in size by only 24 percent, those fed the ammonium variety grew by nearly 49 percent. In addition, the protein content of the plants that received ammonium rose by 73 percent, as compared with only 32 percent for the nitrate-nourished plants. Unpublished work on tomatoes has yielded similar results.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We expect that the data from this study will have real-world implications for crop production," Bloom comments. "In well-drained soils generally devoted to wheat production, nitrate is the common form of nitrogen available in the soil. This study suggests that a shift to increase ammonium availability might be needed." He further notes that faced with continued increases in atmospheric CO2, plants that naturally rely on ammonium for nitrogen would probably have a competitive advantage over those that depend on nitrate¿a differential that could significantly affect the distribution of plants in the wild.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe