Rising Temperatures May Push Ecosystems Past Their Limits

Climate change could expose species to temperatures they have never before experienced

Bleached coral on the Great Barrier Reef outside Cairns Australia.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Climate change is testing Earth’s limits.

It’s altering weather patterns, intensifying natural disasters and breaking temperature records left and right. Eventually, many parts of the world may settle into a “new normal” as climate conditions shift beyond anything the planet has experienced in human history.

That could be devastating for the planet’s ecosystems.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A grave study warns that plants and animals all over the world may soon be living with temperatures they’ve never experienced before. And some of them may not be able to tolerate the changes.

Published yesterday in Nature by scientists Christopher Trisos, Cory Merow and Alex Pigot, the research looks at species assemblages around the world—groups of species that coexist in one space together, and often depend on each other to keep the ecosystem functioning. Species in an assemblage often have similar temperature limits.

Under a severe climate change scenario, in which global average temperatures may rise as much as 7 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century, around 15% of all species assemblages may experience what the researchers dub an “abrupt exposure event.”

That’s when more than a fifth of all species in an assemblage are exposed to temperatures they’ve never experienced before, all in the same decade.

These kinds of events may start to occur as soon as the year 2030 in high-risk places like the tropical oceans. And they could be happening in other parts of the world by the year 2050.

Most scientists say this much warming by the end of the century is probably unlikely, although not impossible—and such high levels of warming could still occur beyond the year 2100.

Less severe scenarios also carry risk.

Under a scenario in which global warming stays below 3.6 F (that’s 2 degrees Celsius, the primary goal of the Paris Agreement), about 2% of all assemblages worldwide would experience an abrupt exposure event between now and the year 2100.

The researchers focused on these abrupt events for several reasons. Some studies have suggested that when a habitat’s diversity declines by 20% or more, there’s a higher risk that the whole ecosystem will suffer a catastrophic die-off. The faster these declines occur, the less time the habitat will have to adapt, and the greater the risk will be.

There’s a much higher likelihood that at least one species in any given assemblage will cross the threshold by the end of the century, although the risk this poses to the whole ecosystem may be lower.

If species do start dying off, “we might initially see a small trickle of species being lost from an assemblage, but this will be followed by an abrupt loss of most species in the assemblage within the same decade,” said Jennifer Sunday, a McGill University scientist, in a published comment on the study.

It’s important to note that this turn of events isn’t guaranteed.

The study investigates the point at which temperatures will rise beyond anything a species has experienced in the past. But it doesn’t prove that those species will die off as soon as this happens.

Some could turn out to be more adaptable than they get credit for, the researchers note. They could naturally be able to survive in temperatures hotter than they’re accustomed to. Or they could migrate into more favorable areas, if they’re fast enough. Or they could evolve to tolerate the new conditions.

That’s the difficulty with climate change—it’s pushing the Earth into new territories. As a result, it’s not always easy or even possible to predict how natural ecosystems will respond.

Extreme climate change could threaten species assemblages all over the world with unprecedented climate conditions within the next 30 years.

And under those conditions, the researchers write, “we have almost no knowledge of the ability of their constituent species to survive.”

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news at www.eenews.net.

Chelsea Harvey covers climate science for Climatewire. She tracks the big questions being asked by researchers and explains what's known, and what needs to be, about global temperatures. Chelsea began writing about climate science in 2014. Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, Popular Science, Men's Journal and others.

More by Chelsea Harvey

E&E News provides essential energy and environment news for professionals.

More by E&E News

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe