Road Runoff Causing Freshwater to Turn Saltier, Study Shows

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Freshwater sources in the northeastern U.S. are becoming increasingly salty, mainly as a result of increased roadway construction, a new report suggests. The findings, published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, indicate that at the current rate of change, some surface waters in the region could become toxic to freshwater life within the century.

Researchers led by Sujay Kaushal of the Institute of Ecosystem Studies in Millbrook, N. Y. studied three locations in Baltimore County, Hudson River Valley and the White Mountains in New Hampshire. The team found that over the past 30 years levels of chloride had risen dramatically. Measuring chloride concentrations can detect an increase in salinization because the anion is an important component of many salts. (Table salt, for example, is sodium chloride (NaCl).) Already, many urban and suburban streams exceed the recommended limit for chloride, which is 250 milligrams per liter. Rural waterbodies, meanwhile, can exceed 100 milligrams per liter on a seasonal basis.

The increased amount of dissolved solids in the water is strongly correlated to the amount of impervious surfaces such as roads and parking lots. In some regions, the increased use of deicer compounds in the winter caused chloride levels to reach five grams per liter, approximately a quarter of that found in seawater. Because land-use changes so rapidly, the authors conclude that "salinization associated with increasing suburban and urbanization deserves attention as one of the most significant threats to the integrity of freshwater ecosystems in the northeastern U.S."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe