Robot Arms Lose Quickly to Teenage Girl

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The world's strongest man needn't worry about relinquishing his title to a robotic competitor anytime soon, a recent contest indicates. At a conference held by the International Society for Optical Engineers in San Diego on Monday, three robotic arms tested their might against a human opponent in arm wrestling matches, which the flesh-and-blood contestant won handily.

Yoseph Bar-Cohen of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., first proposed the idea of a robot-versus-person arm wrestling showdown in 1999 as a means to encourage research into artificial muscles, or electroactive polymers (EAP). Three different designs rose to Monday's challenge and took on 17-year-old high-school student Panna Felsen. A robotic arm manufactured by Environmental Robots Inc. (ERI) in New Mexico put up the best effort, surviving 26 seconds, whereas arms from Virginia Tech and the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research capitulated in under four seconds each.

EAPs change shape when either chemicals or an electric charge activates them. The three robot arms used in the challenge feature different types of the compounds. The Virginia Tech arm contains a chemically activated gel that responds to changes in pH by contracting like a human muscle does. The Swiss arm uses four groupings of electrically activated EAPs and the three-kilogram ERI arm is driven by two sets of artificial muscles made up of different electrically activated polymers. Despite the losses, just staging the competition was beneficial for the field, considering Bar-Cohen thought it would take two decades to become a reality when he first proposed it. Of course, whether the robot arms will ever rise to the ultimate challenge of beating a world champion arm wrestler remains to be seen.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American