Robot Arms Lose Quickly to Teenage Girl

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The world's strongest man needn't worry about relinquishing his title to a robotic competitor anytime soon, a recent contest indicates. At a conference held by the International Society for Optical Engineers in San Diego on Monday, three robotic arms tested their might against a human opponent in arm wrestling matches, which the flesh-and-blood contestant won handily.

Yoseph Bar-Cohen of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., first proposed the idea of a robot-versus-person arm wrestling showdown in 1999 as a means to encourage research into artificial muscles, or electroactive polymers (EAP). Three different designs rose to Monday's challenge and took on 17-year-old high-school student Panna Felsen. A robotic arm manufactured by Environmental Robots Inc. (ERI) in New Mexico put up the best effort, surviving 26 seconds, whereas arms from Virginia Tech and the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research capitulated in under four seconds each.

EAPs change shape when either chemicals or an electric charge activates them. The three robot arms used in the challenge feature different types of the compounds. The Virginia Tech arm contains a chemically activated gel that responds to changes in pH by contracting like a human muscle does. The Swiss arm uses four groupings of electrically activated EAPs and the three-kilogram ERI arm is driven by two sets of artificial muscles made up of different electrically activated polymers. Despite the losses, just staging the competition was beneficial for the field, considering Bar-Cohen thought it would take two decades to become a reality when he first proposed it. Of course, whether the robot arms will ever rise to the ultimate challenge of beating a world champion arm wrestler remains to be seen.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American