Robot Made of Shrinky-Dink Polymer Folds Itself in 4 Minutes

The robot begins as a flat sheet and uses heat to get into shape

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Using techniques inspired by the art of origami, a US-based team has built a robot that can fold itself into shape starting from a flat sheet. The results are described in the 8 August issue of Science.

The robot starts as a sheet of a polymer material — the same one used in Shrinky Dink toys, which shrink when heated in an oven  — with embedded electronics and motors attached to the top side. The sheet is cut such that it can be folded to form a desired structure. The folding requires no human intervention — the sheet contains hinges in which heating elements are embedded to cause the hinges to fold. An embedded computer directs the hinges to fold in a pre-determined order. The robot takes about 4 minutes to reach its final shape, after which the motors kick in and the robot starts walking.

The ability to assemble itself autonomously makes the robot particularly suitable for use in confined or hazardous spaces, such as during search-and-rescue missions in collapsed buildings, says senior author Robert Wood, who studies biologically inspired robots at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The concept of a self-folding robot is intriguing,” says Jacques Penders, an engineer who heads the Center for Automation and Robotics Research at Sheffield Hallam University in the UK. “However — as the video also shows — control of the robot will be a major hurdle to overcome before real applications could be considered.” (The current prototype, seen in the video below, wriggles along somewhat clumsily.)

Daniela Rus, director of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, and a co-author of the paper, says that her team's methods could make robots more affordable and simpler to produce, and thus “democratize access to robots”.

“Our big dream is to make the fabrication of robots fast and inexpensive,” says Rus.

The authors say that they spent $11,000 on the project, but now that the designs are in place, they calculate that such robots would cost $100 each to build in low quantities ($20 for the structure and $80 for the motor and batteries).

But the researchers are not planning to develop their technology for market. Rus says that their objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of the idea. Sam Felton, a mechanical engineer at Harvard and a co-author of the study, says that he and his colleagues are an academic laboratory, so they want to work on “the most interesting and challenging problems, not necessarily the most practical”.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on August 7, 2014.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe