Robots on the Move

Improved mathematical models and sensors endow robots with enhanced mobility

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

In October 2005 teams watched their robots attempt to navigate the rugged Mojave Desert as part of a challenge sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The previous year's challenge had ground to a halt when none of the competitors completed more than 5 percent of the 150-mile race. But last year everything changed. Four robots finished the race in fewer than 10 hours, and the winning Stanford Racing Team's robot, fondly named Stanley, clocked speeds as high as 38 miles per hour. This dramatic turn of fortune can be attributed to advances in software and sensors.

While onboard laser and radar systems scanned the terrain, machine-learning algorithms tracked and studied the images, allowing Stanley, a modified Volkswagen Touareg, to swerve around obstacles and negotiate turns. Probabilistic methods for analyzing the road ahead kept Stanley from a common pitfall for robotic vehicles: hallucinating imaginary obstacles.

While Stanley may have a human name, the two-legged robot RABBIT has a disarmingly human gait (left). Jessy W. Grizzle, a control theorist at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, has tested his new mathematical model of walking and running on RABBIT, whose lower legs taper to wheels rather than feet. Because this robot is not able to statically balance on one leg, the model incorporates the effects of gravity more fully than other models. As scientists endeavor to automate more human tasks, robots may exhibit pleasing form as well as function.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American