Rogue Nuclear Tests Could Be Spotted with New Method

Today's Nuclear Security Summit tackles proliferation, and scientists try a way to trace gases from secret bombs

Kim Jong-Un

Since 1996, 183 nations have signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which prohibits underground testing of nuclear weapons. However, India, North Korea, and Pakistan have not signed the treaty, and North Korea claims to have conducted four underground explosions in the past decade.

Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have improved their ability to detect underground nuclear explosions set off  by rogue nations, a development sure to be of interest as the Nuclear Security Summit kicks off its 2016 meeting in Washington D.C. today.

A team led by Charles R. Carrigan at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) used field experiments to build a new, complex model that predicts isotopic ratios of noble gases that would be released from such explosions (Sci. Rep. 2016; DOI:10.1038/srep23032). These gases would be carried away in the atmosphere after an explostion and investigators could look for the isotopic signatures thousands of kilometers away from the test site and even months afterward.

Since 1996, 183 nations have signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which prohibits underground testing of nuclear weapons. However, India, North Korea, and Pakistan have not signed the treaty, and North Korea claims to have conducted four underground explosions in the past decade.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The U.S. continues to observe a moratorium on nuclear testing, so scientists, particularly at government facilities such as LLNL and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), develop ways to detect these events without creating an explosion themselves. They have looked to indirect evidence, such as seismic data and noble gas transport. They’ve focused in particular on the migration of radioisotopes 133Xe and 37Ar, which are telltale signatures of a nuclear explosion.

In this new work, Carrigan’s team injected gas tracers into an old cavity in Nevada created by an underground nuclear explosion and studied how the gases were transported and released from the cavity.

Their model addresses some complexities of gas transport in geological systems. Previous studies have modeled existing ground fractures, but the LLNL group also included fractures created by the force of the explosion. “We show that the earth is not a perfect container” for gases, Carrigan says.

Their simulations also show that isotopic ratios of radioactive xenon gas are dependent on the magnitude of the explosion. “This suggests that measuring isotopic ratios of downwind gases might potentially tell us something about the nuclear yield or size of an underground nuclear explosion,” Carrigan says.

“This work is of great interest to the nuclear detection community,” LANL’s Philip H. Stauffer says, noting the importance of the Carrigan team’s addition of a more complete set of isotopes, which will help inform a model of explosion-generated fractures recently developed at Los Alamos.

The model’s noble-gas ratio predictions were similar to the ratios found in atmospheric data gathered from as far away as Japan and Russia nearly two months after North Korea announced it had conducted an underground explosion in 2013.

The researchers hope atmospheric data from North Korea’s alleged underground test in January become available so that they can compare them to predictions from their model.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemical & Engineering News (© American Chemical Society). The article was first published on March 28, 2016.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe