Rollback of California Car Rules Will Cause Emissions to Spike

Lower fuel economy standards and fewer electric vehicles in the state would threaten global climate targets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Revoking California’s Clean Air Act waiver would let greenhouse gas emissions soar and electric vehicle sales plummet, new research shows.

The analysis by the economic consulting firm Rhodium Group examined the climate impact of the Trump administration’s planned rollback of Obama-era clean car standards.

The rollback has two main components. It would freeze fuel economy standards at 2020 levels through 2026, allowing cars to travel much shorter distances on one tank of gas, and would revoke California’s Clean Air Act waiver for greenhouse gases, which lets the state set tougher emissions rules than those of the federal government.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If the administration pursues only the first component, an additional 493 million to 684 million metric tons of carbon dioxide will enter the atmosphere, the research found.

But if the administration pursues both components as planned, CO2 emissions will soar by an additional 1,055 million to 1,317 million metric tons.

The analysis found a similar effect on sales of zero-emission vehicles, including plug-in hybrid and battery-electric models.

If the administration freezes only fuel economy standards, there will be 6 million to 7 million fewer ZEVs on the road.

But if the administration freezes the standards and revokes California’s Clean Air Act waiver, ZEV sales will plummet by 12 million to 14 million.

Emily Wimberger, a climate economist at Rhodium Group and lead author of the research, said the findings show the “outsized impact” of the California waiver.

“The difference between the California waiver being revoked and the waiver remaining in place is pretty large,” said Wimberger, a former chief economist at the California Air Resources Board.

Ultimately, the findings highlight the importance of the California waiver to meeting global temperature targets.

In the 2015 Paris Agreement, nations pledged to limit warming to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. But in a landmark report last year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned that countries must limit warming to 1.5 C or risk abandoning billions of people to the runaway impacts of climate change.

“When we’re thinking about trying to reach long-term climate targets, the California waiver really does change the trajectory of where we’re going and really could put us off track to get below 1.5 degrees Celsius,” Wimberger said.

Wimberger also noted that the average life span of a vehicle is 12 years, so if ZEV sales plateau now, future generations will feel the effects.

“Because vehicles have a 12-year life expectancy, every ZEV that’s not put on the road now means we’re going to continue to rely on petroleum-based vehicles far into the future,” she said.

EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have not yet finalized the two components of the rollback. The two agencies are expected to wrap up their work in November or December.

EPA didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from E&E News. E&E provides daily coverage of essential energy and environmental news atwww.eenews.net.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe