Rooting the Human Family Tree in Africa

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scholars have long debated the exact origins of our species. Some have maintained that modern humans probably arose simultaneously in several regions of the globe. They base these arguments largely on the fossil record, which shows that some of our immediate predecessors¿Homo neanderthalensis and Homo erectus, for instance¿had migrated out of Africa as early as two million years ago. But a new study published in today's issue of Nature lends more credibility to the rival theory¿namely that Homo sapiens emerged only in Africa, and only later infiltrated other regions, wiping out the Neanderthals already living there over time.

Instead of tracking our family tree with fossils, the study's authors¿Ulf Gyllensten and Max Ingman of the University of Uppsala, and Henrik Kaessmann and Svante P¿¿bo of the Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology¿turned to the living. They completed the most extensive analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) ever done, taking samples from 53 people having diverse geographical, racial and linguistic backgrounds. Unlike the DNA within chromosomes, which is inherited from both parents and so changes slightly with each generation, mtDNA is passed directly from mother to child; only random mutations alter its sequence. As a result, it offers a powerful measure of how closely different populations are related.

Earlier work on mtDNA had focused exclusively on the control regions of the sequence, which account for a scant 7 percent of its total. In contrast, Gyllensten and his colleagues worked out the entire mtDNA sequence¿a string of some 16,500 base pairs¿for each individual in their study. From this data, they weeded out stretches of DNA that had mutated unusually quickly and so very likely represented little more than twigs on the family tree. When they compared the rest, a trunk and major branches became clear: the most recent common ancestor of all subjects in the study lived in sub-Saharan Africa some 171,500 to 50,000 years ago, suggesting that we are all descended from a single group there. In addition, they found a major branch separating most Africans from non-Africans, which probably represents H. sapiens' first major exodus from the continent, 52,000 to 27,500 years ago.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe