New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Rotor in Motor

Replacing aluminum with copper in electric motors saves energy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Afew percentage points of improvement in energy efficiency are rarely noteworthy, but those digits add up fast when the technology involved annually consumes several hundred billion kilowatt-hours of electricity worldwide. About two thirds of the juice used by American industry, for example, drives the countless electric motors running pumps, compressors, fans, conveyors and other devices in factories and plants nationwide, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. After a decade-long R&D effort, engineers have succeeded in wresting a bit more efficiency from these motors. And industry has just begun to take notice.

Small versions of so-called three-phase AC induction motors, which generate from one to 20 horsepower, can convert as much as 90 percent of the power they draw into rotary mechanical force. Today’s standard designs feature rotors—rotating electromagnetic armatures—composed of die-cast aluminum, but motor engineers have long known that copper rotors would save energy, says metallurgist Dale Peters. “Copper has substantially higher electrical conductivity than aluminum, which significantly cuts the resistive losses in rotors,” he explains. “But copper melts at 1,083 degrees Celsius, significantly hotter than aluminum’s melting point, which poses big problems for die casters.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe