Running Rats Reveal Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Having a low aerobic capacity can lead to problems greater than just being the slowest runner at the gym, new research suggests. Results of a rat study indicate that aerobically challenged animals exhibit more risk factors linked to heart disease than aerobically gifted rats do.

Steven L. Britton of the University of Michigan Health System and his colleagues bred 11 generations of laboratory rats that were selected for their exercise capacity, so that the latest litters differ significantly from one another in their ability to use oxygen effectively. "Essentially, we are breeding for genes that code for low levels of proteins involved in mitochondrial function," Britton explains. "Our hypothesis is that impaired mitochondrial function may be what links low aerobic capacity and disease." The scientists subjected the rats to treadmill testing (without training them extensively) and found that one group tired after 14 minutes of running, whereas the group that was the best at utilizing oxygen could be on the move for 42 minutes before exhaustion set in. In addition to tuckering out more easily, the rats with low aerobic capacity had higher levels of blood fat disorders and insulin resistance, and more abdominal fat than the long-distance runners did, as well as having higher blood pressure and more vascular dysfunction.

The results provide yet more impetus to get back to the gym. "The reality of having a genetic determinant of our existence is that there are some people who are born with less ability to take up oxygen and transfer energy than others," Britton remarks. "These people may have to work harder and will never reach the status of a professional athlete, but almost everyone can improve their aerobic capacity and health status with regular exercise."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American