Safer Antifreeze Made from Food Additive and Nanoparticles

Toxic chemical can be replaced by a fluid of propylene glycol and small metal particles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Replacing toxic ethylene glycol—the principal component of antifreezes and de-icers—with the food additive propylene glycol, and adding nanoparticles to improve the mixture’s properties, researchers at US company ACTA Technologyhave created an antifreeze formula that they say is safer, more environmentally friendly and performs better than existing products.

Although poisonous, ethylene glycol has a sweet taste and every year thousands of people, many of them children, and countless pets and wild animals, are poisoned by accidentally drinking antifreeze. Propylene glycol, on the other hand, is safe to consume, and is used as an additive in some foods to keep them moist. It is already used as an antifreeze in some industries such as food production, but its viscous, syrup-like consistency makes it unsuitable for widespread use.

‘Our goal was to create a non-toxic heat transfer fluid that overcomes the traditional limitations of a propylene glycol-water mix,’ says Michael Minard, ACTA’s chief executive, speaking at the 249th ACS National Meeting & Exposition in Denver, US. Adding metal oxide nanoparticles to the mixture reduces its viscosity, he explains. ‘One of the properties we see is shear-thinning which reduces the viscosity substantially.’


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Other researchers working on ‘nanofluids’ like this have struggled with viscosity, adds ACTA’s chief technology officer Edward Clancy, because they use surfactants to stop the nanoparticles sticking together. The nanoparticles that ACTA use, however, are stable without surfactant because of their positive charge and non-spherical, branched chain structure. ‘Because we’re not bound by using a surfactant we’re not paying the viscosity penalty that so many of our predecessors have stumbled into,’ says Clancy.

The resulting solution is not only non-toxic, but may actually be more effective as antifreeze, with nearly double the heat transfer capacity of ethylene glycol-based formulations. ‘The thermal conductivity of these metallic [nanoparticles] is much higher than that of the base fluid, so if you put them in you increase the overall heat transfer,’ Clancy explains.

ACTA have patented their antifreeze and are currently investigating ways to scale up production. Minard says the overall cost of making it will be ‘near to or lower than’ ethylene glycol antifreezes, and they are optimistic it will be reach the market within a few years. ‘We believe that the finished product will have a wide variety of uses in various industries,’ says Minard.

Consultant toxicologist John Hoskins, who was not involved in the research, says replacing ethylene glycol with propylene glycol is, on the whole, a positive step that would reduce poisonings, but points out that the environmental impacts of any new formula must be considered, as well as toxicity. ‘In the environment ethylene glycol degrades more quickly than propylene glycol,’ he says. ‘[And in existing products] ethylene glycol is more effective at depressing the freezing point, so more propylene glycol may needed in antifreeze to achieve the same effect.’

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on March 26, 2015.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe