Safety Steam Boiler

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Measures to secure a patent for improvements in the above have been taken by Stephen Waterman, of Williamsburgh, N. Y., the original invention having been patented on the 28th of Dec, 1852. It is an improvement on the plan for preventing the serious casualties consequent to boiler explosions, which was noticed on page 108 of the present volume. It will be recollected that a u safety chamber was placed upon the boiler,and that when the steam attained an undue pressure it tore a plate which separated the chamber from the boiler, and as the steam gained additional space, its pressure on the square inch was reduced. This plan, although completely effective, involved the necessity of a large safety chamber, it is to reduce the dimensions of this appliance, that the present patent is chiefly designed. A reservoir ot cold water is pi aced in juxtaposition to the boiler and its appurtenances, so that the top communicates with the boiler and the bottom with the safety chamber, both communications being opened and closed by cocks. By this contrivance, when the plate bursts, its disruption acts upon an arrangement which opens both communications, and the steam pressure on both sides of the water being equalized, this latter fluid, by its gravity, will descend into the chamber and condense the steam, or if considered preterable, it might pass directly into the boiler.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 26This article was published with the title “Safety Steam Boiler” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 26 (), p. 204
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican03121853-204

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe